Driving back from Evansville, I came upon this right wing radio host
that was justifying the US invasion of Iraq. He compared Hitler
to Hussein. I don't dial and drive so I didn't call in during his
show. I've sent him an email which is posted below.
In fairness to him, his sight is: http://www.michaelmedved.com
I think these right wing entertainers are funny. I just wish Americans realized they are entertainers, not reporters.
Anyway, here's my response to his stance that Hitler and Hussein are the same:
Dear Mr. Medved,
While on a road trip, tiring from music from my ipod, I
scanned the radio stations and came upon your program. This was a program where listeners called in
and talked about their problems and differences with your point of view.
I’ve never heard of you and I doubt I’ll ever listen again
unless I’m bored on a road trip again and stumble upon your program.
I was intrigued (laughed) when you successfully nailed down
a caller about the need to invade Iraq
based on the similarity with France’s
lack of response to Germany’s
aggression in the early and mid 1930’s.
First, let me congratulate you on your dialectic skill. You are a master of taking a completely
unrelated topic and turning it into a yes or no question that will bring your
opponent down. You seem to be a good debater,
even when your position lacks reason.
The way the world responded to Hitler, or Genghis Khan or
Alexander the Great has no relevance to the way we should have responded to
Saddam Hussein. In fact, your argument
destroys your stance. But let me take
your point of view for a moment and defend your stance.
You seem to imply that if France or any other nation had
stood up to Hitler’s violation of the Treaty of Versailles in the mid 30’s that
we could have escaped the ravages of world war two. For the sake of argument I’ll give you that
(though I wouldn’t have given you that in such simplistic terms as you were
looking for on your radio program). I’m
not so easily trapped in unrelated arguments.
So yes, maybe if they had, Hitler would not have invaded and
occupied other countries.
So let’s take this unrelated argument about Hussein (and by
the way, the only relation they have as far as I can tell is that their last
name starts with an H).
Hitler invaded several countries and occupied them before
the world took a stand. Hussein invaded
and occupied one before the world took notice and banded together and drove him
out. Clearly, the world responded to
Hussein differently than the world responded to Hitler in the mid 30’s.
Hussein was the leader of a small country with a castrated
military in 2002. He presented no threat
to the United States and he
had no part in the attacks on the US on 9-11.
The world responded differently and more aggressively to
Hussein than they did to Hitler, but it’s still unrelated (though it does
destroy your contention that Hitler parallels justify our need to invade Iraq).
But let me take your side for a bit longer. You argue that Hussein had repeatedly
violated promises, treaties and such and therefore the world should no longer
tolerate him and was therefore justified in invading Iraq. O.K. Let
me give you that argument for a moment.
But then, I assume that since the United States repeatedly lied, broke
promises, treaties, etc with Native Americans that if there had been a body
such as the UN in those days that they would be justified in invading the US to
force us to live up to those treaties.
We killed many Native Americans to achieve our goal and destiny. Substitute Kurds or Shiites for Native
Americans and tell me how we differ?
Tell me how we didn’t deserve to be invaded and occupied by the larger
military forces of England
and France.
O.K. I took your side for a moment and I feel slimy. Consider me no longer taking that side.
You then told a caller that George Bush was a “visionary
leader that got things right more often than he got them wrong.” I’m still laughing about that. I’m not even going to comment on that because
it’s like shooting fish in a barrel. It’s
too easy. It’s such a target rich
environment. I’ll leave that one to your
brain dead callers.
I still respect your abilities to debate the unprepared and
I think you’re a good entertainer.
Until we meet on a lonely highway again,
Bob
Recent Comments